Pests news from BPCA

04 August 2020

BPCA position statement on remote monitoring for rodent management

TECHNICAL | PPC100 August 2020

Digital monitoring for pest activity appears in lists of services offered by pest management companies across the world. But what will the impact of remote monitoring have on the level of service a company provides? Is this a new tool to power-up a pest professional, or is it an attempt to automate our jobs?

BPCA position statement on remote monitoring for rodent management

Remote monitoring utilises sensors and cameras, connected via a network, to alert someone of rodent activity on a particular site. 

This technology is developing fast in the UK market. As with all innovation, BPCA is generally supportive of remote monitoring as a part of an integrated pest management programme.

However, BPCA is aware that pest management companies are sometimes promoting remote rodent monitoring devices as an alternative to visits from a pest professional. We recommend extreme caution before incorporating this model as part of your service.

BPCA is certainly not opposed to technological innovation, and we believe that remote monitoring techniques will play a part in the future of pest management. However, the implementation needs to be carefully considered.

Technology can enhance a technician or devalue their expertise and professionalism, depending on the way it’s implemented.

You’ll never be able to replace an expert pest professional with an automated monitoring system. However, you can use the technology to prepare, inform and protect your technicians and better protect your client. For example:

  • An alert system that is working all day, 365 days a year, can help you provide a faster response to a potential infestation
  • The data provided by the monitors can serve as a valuable education tool for your client and help demonstrate the value of your service
  • Remote monitoring may save you time onsite and allow for a technician’s attention to be directed to areas of a contract where pests pose the greatest risk
  • When paired with a live capture trap, technician response time to a catch can be reduced, supporting the humane control of species such as grey squirrels
  • They can also be used to help protect technicians from health and safety issues as monitors can be placed in situations unsafe for a technician to enter routinely.

However, BPCA believes that the technology should be utilised to supplement and improve your professional services – not replace them in the pursuit of greater profit margins.

The limits of remote monitors are clear. If you replace technician visits with remote monitoring then you should consider:

  • How will the presence of other pests
  • such as invertebrates be determined and levels monitored?
  • Can the system be left activated where non-target species may gain access?
  • How will you be aware of rodents exhibiting behavioural resistance or bait shyness and consequently avoiding the units?
  • How will other signs of rodent infestations be monitored such as droppings, smear marks, tail swipes, footprints, smells, etc?
  • How will those areas not covered by the units be monitored?
  • How will you meet your legal and moral due diligence requirements?
  • How will you demonstrate excellent customer service and build a relationship with your client?
  • How will you educate your clients on pest prevention measures?
  • Will the system identify false positives, or will these result in more trips to site?
  • Is the system robust and reliable enough to provide acceptable feedback through data sharing?
  • Will your client value your service if they think your job can be done by technology they could purchase themselves?

Always use technology to highlight the professionalism of your people.

Research new technology thoroughly making sure it’s fit for purpose and identify any weaknesses before you implement something new.

Approach innovation as a way to enhance your team – not to replace your workforce with automated systems.

Technology won’t spot signs of a secondary infestation. It won’t advise on proofing measures. It won’t say ‘hi’ to the staff on-site and put a face to the name of your company.

Don’t undermine your professionalism with technology – enhance it!

Prepared by the BPCA Servicing Committee.

Source: PPC100

Highlights View all news

17 September 2020

Latest news

Guidance on test and trace procedures for pest management companies

BPCA has released a free guidance document for pest professionals considering implementing a test and trace procedure during the Covid-19 pandemic. Download now With the easing of so

Read more

10 September 2020

Latest news

SURVEY: Help us change licences for gull control in 2021 and beyond

After a challenging year for gull control in England, BPCA is asking the pest management community to help us make the process for getting a licence better. BPCA has the opportunity to positive

Read more

05 August 2020

Latest news

The UK pest landscape and the quiet revolution

TECHNICAL | PPC100 August 2020 In our 100th edition of PPC, regular contributor Clive Boase reviews how far the pest management industry has come since PPC first launched and, critically,

Read more
Latest View all news

22 October 2020

Latest news

Know your zoonosis – CRRU on rodent to human disease transfer

Phil Christopher, CRRU, reminds professionals to take the opportunity to explain why we control rats, by looking at the zoonotic diseases rodents carry. "Whenever possible, take

Read more

22 October 2020

Latest news

VIDEO: Squirrel control for pest professionals

In this video Natalie discusses the key points to consider when controlling squirrels. This video is intended for those working in the pest management sector. Information correct at the ti

Read more

22 October 2020

Latest news

OPINION: When will professional users of rodenticides wake up to the potential consequences of their actions?

Opinion| Rodenticide Resistance Dr John Simmons, Acheta Consulting, writes about the consequences of not taking rodenticide resistance seriously following a CRRU statement about new survey result

Read more